The listed company has to provide explanation for not complying with the code provisions. Individual characteristics shall be considered such as the size, nature of business, business strategy, complexity of operation, the nature of risks in formulating its own corporate governance practices.
SEHK published a consultation paper in June on improving the risk management and internal control elements of the listed companies. The CG Manual covers: HSBC stated in its corporate governance report in that: BEA stated in its corporate governance report in that: Essay UK - http: If this essay isn't quite what you're looking for, why not order your own custom Management essay, dissertation or piece of coursework that answers your exact question?
There are UK writers just like me on hand, waiting to help you. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question.
Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Management work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours. If you are the original author of this content and no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal:. Essay UK offers professional custom essay writing, dissertation writing and coursework writing service. Our work is high quality, plagiarism-free and delivered on time. Registered Data Controller No: Accounting essays Architecture essays Business essays Coursework Economics essays Education essays Engineering essays English language essays English literature essays.
Medicine essays Miscellaneous essays Psychology essays Religious studies essays Science essays Sociology essays Essays menu.
Why good corporate governance is important to a listed bank in Hong Kong? The implication of this statement is that members of audit committees are likely to be less effective than expected by external stakeholders. This is difficult to test in real cases but field experiments regarding the procedure adopted by companies for selecting auditors have found limited involvement of the audit committee in the auditor selection decision Fiolleau et al.
This behaviour of audit committee reduces assurance of investors and lenders regarding financial reports. Internal controls have gained importance after the failure of firms like Enron. Internal control and risks disclosure increase information of stakeholders regarding earnings in the future. A sound system of internal control in a company depends on a regular evaluation of the business and financial risks Turnbull guidance, Risks are uncertainties which can have a negative impact on profits.
Therefore, risk management can positively influence on profits of the firm. It is argued that the perceived lack in risk management, especially by the financial services firms, resulted in the financial crisis in ASX, This has increased the emphasis on risk management through effective oversight and internal control ASX, The disclosure of risk management processes provide further positive assurance to investors as it shows that the management is taking steps to safeguard their wealth.
A review of the annual reports of companies shows more emphasis on internal control in the recent year. The assessment of internal controls by external auditors is a regulatory requirement in the US.
The auditors of PepsiCo defined stated that internal control provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes PepsiCo, This gives higher assurance to external stakeholders. The objective of the internal control audit by an external auditor is to assess the risk that a material weakness exists within the functions of an organisation, which can have a negative impact on its valuation.
The description appears to be customary, but the company discloses the fee structure and roles of governments in determining revenue of the firm in different countries Sonic Healthcare, This is useful for an investor who wants to analyse the impact of government austerity measures on future revenues of the firm.
However, there are inherent limitations in internal controls which imply that they may not prevent or detect financial misstatements. The reporting of the internal control function to the senior management creates doubt about its effectiveness. External stakeholders will be sceptical about the ability of the internal control function to report frauds being conducted by the management.
Olympus fraud in Japan resulted in heavy losses for investors. The fraud went on for more than a decade before it became public news. This shows that internal control measures were not effective in preventing the management from committing the fraud. The above analysis shows that audit committee and internal reporting on control and risks increase assurance regarding the quality of financial reports to external stakeholders.
The audit committee disclosures are useful in increasing assurance regarding the quality and truthfulness of the historic information. The disclosure of internal control and risk reporting gives higher assurance regarding the future earnings of the business. However, there are some limitations in both disclosures, but it is better to have these disclosures than not having them. Recommendations This section of the report discusses how current disclosures can be made more informative to assist in assessing the transparency and accountability of corporations.
A number of recommendations are made to increase transparency and accountability. One of the main observations was the way information was presented in the majority of annual reports. All companies had information as required by their national corporate governance codes. However, in many cases the information seemed to be included in annual reports to meet the obligations of being seen as a good corporate entity rather than being done for the purpose of enhancing transparency.
As an example, all annual reports had information about the Board of Directors in terms of their skills and experience. However, it was only in the case of BHP Billiton that the management had taken extra effort to present the information in a graphical and user-friendly manner.
The annual report of BHP Billiton showed pie charts with age, skill and location distribution of its Board of Directors. This was much easier to grasp than the descriptions seen in the majority of the cases. Users of annual reports would find it much easier to look at these graphics for analysing the diversity and experience of the Board of Directors, and therefore it is recommended that companies should adopt similar presentation formats. Currently, the management of a company is responsible for its internal control over financial reporting.
This has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is that the internal control function can quickly get in touch with the management if any issue needs to be reported. This may allow the risk or fraud to continue for a longer duration.
The disadvantage of this reporting structure is that the internal control may find it difficult to highlight an issue if the senior management engages in financial frauds. It is also expected that employees appointed in the internal control function may have been with the company for some time, and therefore may have developed a personal relationship with the senior management. This also makes it difficult to report any violation by the senior management.
It is recommended that the annual report of a company should disclose all financial frauds over a certain amount or percentage of equity of the company. This would increase the knowledge of investors and lenders regarding the state of corporate governance within the company. It is also recommended that each company should establish a guideline which should state that if a corporate fraud is more than a certain amount or percentage of its equity, then the internal control function would report to the audit committee with regards to investigation of that fraud.
This would increase the independence of the internal control function without overburdening the audit committee with small frauds. This step will increase the faith of investors in the financial reports of the company. It is also recommended that companies should make effort to ensure that users of annual reports find it easier to obtain information on risks and internal control measures. Risk is an important topic in the majority of annual reports, but information on risk is not typically available in one place in annual reports.
Some firms, such as Siemens, provided clear links but others failed to point properly to look for material on risk management. The content on risk and internal control can be overwhelming for investors, especially individual investors who wish to know about the future prospects of a company but find it too time consuming to go through all content in an annual report.
Since risk has a material impact on the future earnings and cash flows, it is recommended that major risk elements and controls in place to mitigate them should be presented in a bulleted summary somewhere ideally in early chapters in an annual report.
This will help investors in gaining a better understanding of risks of investing in a business. Annual reports of companies list a number of risk factors which may influence the performance and financial position of the business in the short and long-term.
Listing of risks is useful for investors and lenders but again the effort seems to be on meeting the obligatory requirements under the national corporate governance codes of countries.
The effectiveness of risk disclosure can be improved by including a risk-ranking matrix in annual reports. This will allow investors to focus quickly on major risks and look for steps being taken to mitigate them.
It will also help users of annual reports to see if the management of the firm is prioritising more on areas that need greater attention. Firms should design and put into practice strong whistle-blowing systems to ensure that employees with knowledge of frauds within the company can report them to the Board of Directors without the fear of being prosecuted.
In the case of Olympus, the board of the company fired its CEO for questioning suspicious transactions. If this was the treatment given to the CEO, employees at lower level could not have thought of reporting the fraud without being severely reprimanded.
Protection of employees is important because most external whistle-blowers first blow the whistle internally Kaptein, Thus, developing a system that encourages internal whistle blowing could result in early detection of frauds. In terms of accountability, there should be more emphasis placed on the accountability of independent and non-executive directors. Currently, accountability rests with the executive board. It is recommended that the non-executive directors are also made more accountable because of the impacts of their actions.
In the event of failure of the audit committee, the designated independent director should be approached first and his actions should be reviewed. This will increase accountability of independent directors and they will take their role more seriously. There is a risk that some experienced people may not wish to take non-executive director roles because of the increased accountability.
This has to be weighed in, but the loss of wealth of shareholders in a large company due to fraud is more important. Conclusion The purpose of this report was to analyse and compare corporate governance practices in countries and companies in three main areas: Board of Directors, audit committee, and internal control and risks.
Corporate governance is a useful tool to increase faith in capital markets, especially in the case of firms where owners are different from managers. The corporate governance systems across the world have shown convergence, but there are some differences.
The corporate governance developments in four countries were briefly reviewed. The Cadbury Committee played an important role in the development of corporate governance code in the UK. The US code is stricter after the Enron scandal. The main difference with the German code on corporate governance is that companies in Germany have two-tier boards.
Independence of directors is important in all countries and was reflected in individual company analysis also. Size of Board of Directors and diversity skills are also important.
Actual independence depends upon actions taken by the Board of Directors and is not possible to analyse with the data in annual reports. Shareholders use historic data to predict future earnings, so they are interested in risks which may reduce earnings and cash flows in the future. Therefore, they rely on audit committees and internal reporting to assure themselves about the quality of financial reporting.
All companies had some members on their audit committees who had financial experience. Some companies disclosed the lead person in audit committees with financial expertise.
It was difficult to observe skills in the case of German companies, as they did not disclose individual audit committee members in their annual reports.
Emphasis on internal control has increased and companies disclosed summary of policies for the management of business risks. Management also reported the effectiveness of their management of material business risks. This gives users of annual reports more comfort about the quality of internal controls present in a firm to mitigate risks. However, it is difficult for users to comprehend the actual steps being taken.
There should be effort to present major risks and internal control steps in a user-friendly manner to improve the disclosure of risk information. The report recommended a number of actions which can be taken to increase the effectiveness of disclosures.
Firstly, companies should try to present some key information about directors in a user-friendly visual manner to help readers of annual reports make better judgements. Secondly, the annual report should disclose all financial frauds over a certain amount or percentage of equity of the company. Thirdly, companies should establish a guideline that if a corporate fraud is more than a certain amount or percentage of its equity, then the internal control function would report to the audit committee with regards to the investigation of that fraud.
This would increase the independence of the internal control function and reduce the potential of financial statement frauds by the management. Finally, in terms of accountability, it is recommended that independent directors should be held more accountable for their work as the lack of their effective actions can cause substantial losses to shareholders and lenders.
Guidance on audit committee. Principles of contemporary corporate governance. German Corporate Governance Code. There is heavy emphasis to business and profits and no emphasis to society related activities.
This category consists of state owned, central government owned public sector enterprises, some of the very old private companies running on the lines of Public Sector Enterprises. This is almost opposite type of private corporations. Lack of accountability more concern for employee welfare and lack of competitiveness in product and marketing.
There will be many cases of bribery and unethical practices in various corporate related activities. They are competent in their industry, do-well, grow well and take care of the Corporate Social Responsibilities to the maximum possible extent. The morale of employees is very high and job satisfaction is yet to achieve.
The key issues that guide a company as to how and who are managing is based on the finance structure of the company which has direct bearing on ownership or who is the boss? The institutional environment inside and outside the organisation plays a crucial role in decision making issues. Indian corporate is yet to achieve success in corporate governance, setting values and flextime working. This is due to the facts that Indians follow discipline under regulations of rules. Ethical values cover various aspects like fair competition, social responsibility, consumer care and corporate image.
If ethics committee is active that itself is enough caution for employees to refrain from unethical practices. Social audit is a systematic assessment of ethical behaviour and actions and reporting on some meaningful activities of the company having social impact. For example, pollution control, social programmes, customer care etc. The concept of corporate Governance has been used in different perspectives. Corporate governance has been defined in many different ways by scholars and agencies.
Deveshwar, Chairman of ITC corporate governance refers to the structure, systems, and processes in a corporation, that are considered most appropriate to enhance its wealth generating capacity. A review of various definitions and views brings out that in its simplistic form corporate governance is an umbrella term encompassing various issues concerning senior management, board of directors, shareholders and other corporate stakeholders.
Corporate governance is collective term encompassing various issues concerning top management, board of directors, shareholders and the corporate stakeholders. It includes ethics and values of the company and its top management. There is no single definition of corporate governance. The definitions are evolving. Definitions by experts in the field are noted. This is often limited to the question of improving financial performance. The corporate governance structure specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation, such as, the board, managers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and spells out the rules and procedures for making decisions on corporate affairs.
Others use the expression as if it were synonymous with shareholders democracy. Corporate governance is a topic recently conceived, as yet ill-defined, and consequently blurred at the edges……. Integrated framework frame work whereby people formally organise themselves for a defined purpose in a corporation, and they apply systemic processes consistently to achieve predicted performance for sustainable development.
A continuous process through which conflicting or diverse interests may be accommodated and cooperative action may taken. The governance frame work is there to encourage the efficient use of resources. Corporate governance is management of structuring, operating and controlling a company with a view to achieve long term strategic goals to satisfy its stakeholders namely shareholders, creditors, employees, customers, suppliers and those connected.
Corporate governance prescribes a code of conduct in relation to all the stake holders. Hence sets a framework of effective accountability to its stake holders. Good corporate governance serves several important objectives. It enhances corporate performance by creating an environment that motivate managers to maximise returns on investment, enhance operational efficiency and ensure long-term productivity growth basis. It also ensures that corporations conform with the interests of investors and society by creating fairness, transparency and accountability in business activities among employees, management and the board.
Corporate Governance is a systemic process by which the companies are directed and controlled to enhance their wealth generating capacity.
Since large corporations employ vast quantum of societal resources, governance process should ensure that these companies are managed in a manner that meets stake-holders aspiration and societal expectations. Corporate Governance is based on the principles of integrity, fairness, equity transparency, accountability and commitment to values. Good governance practices stem from the culture and mindset of the organisation. As stakeholders across the globe evince keen interest in the practices and performance of companies, Corporate Governance has emerged on the centre stage.
Introduction of Corporate Governance in a company brings order and methods in decision making process and fixes who should own the responsibility. That is the goal and role classification emerge. The company will focus on its mission, vision and not an personal likes and dislikes of few top officers. The benefits of corporate governance are difficult to quantity in short range. Accounting jugglery and showing profits give a company short term gains but they are not long term policies for financial credibility.
The unethical policies or mismanagement by CEO or director of a company will be exposed by adhering to corporate governance principles.
Corporate governance will throw light on excessive remunerations given to directors or CEO. It improves, investor confidence and relations. The occurrence of frauds and mismanagement can be detected early for remedial actions.
It is also agreed that no system can remove fraudulent practices fully. Corporate governance is open democratic system. They may appear long winded or time consuming or individual decision making is hindered. The risk of fraud is much bigger and damage to a company. Introduction of corporate governance has a publicity images or snob value where the companies with corporate governance are treated by investors and the general public as prosperous and forward looking.
Corporate governance helps institutional investors. The autocratic ways of working by top brass is removed.
Corporate governance creates a new open culture in the organisation. The trust generated by corporate governance will improve participative performance of the organisation. More and more will come forward to provide financial capital, supply goods, buy goods and service and join the company. The market capitalisation of a company comes down drastically whenever a company is known to follow unethical practices. This was seen in the cases of Satyam and Sun group cases in recent past.
The society is investing its resources in a company, naturally it will be duty of the company to provide its stakeholders a honest and clear performance account. To achieve this company has to initiate corporate governance and follow-up effective implementation. The corporate governance policies and methods vary around the world through the basic principles remain the same. In addition to written laws and codes on proper governance the companies should have its voluntary codes matching its mission and objectives.
The corporate governance helps in removing unnecessary controls by vested interests. Late nineteenth century in USA the then large companies like Standard Oil and Rail Road Company top brass collected pay-checks and perks unheard in history and used them to build lavish mansions in islands.
The resources of a company were clearly siphoned off for private luxury.
Corporate Governance. Executive Summary. The main goal of the report is to evaluate the current corporate governance of a certain organization. In this report, the company that has given emphasis is a food retailing company which operates in UK.
(a) Introduction. Effective corporate governance mechanism, professional and ethical board of directors and senior management, proper internal control system and sound legal system and regulatory framework are the conditions leading to .
This essay has been submitted by a law student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance Corporate Governance is the relationship between the shareholders, directors, and management of a company, as defined by the corporate character, bylaws, formal policies and rule laws.
Introduction. Corporate governance has re-emerged as one of the most talked about business topics in the twenty-first century after the failure of some of the large public-listed companies (Banks, ). - Corporate Governance Corporate Governance is the relationship between the shareholders, directors, and management of a company, as defined by the corporate character, bylaws, formal policies and rule laws.